Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Foreign invest lawyers in Vietnam. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Foreign invest lawyers in Vietnam. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Chủ Nhật, 8 tháng 10, 2023

Plan to Simplify Regulations on Telecom, Gaming, Internet Service

 



In the process of economic integration and development, in order to create favorable conditions for business and service sectors under the management of the Ministry of Information and Communications, Vietnam has approved the plan to reduce and simplify regulations a number of regulations under its control.


Accordingly, Decision No. 1994/QD-TTg agreed to reduce and simplify regulations related to business lines: Provision of pay radio and television services; Provide G1, G2, G3, G4 video games online; Newspapers; Telecommunications service business; publisher’s activities; Business in printing services, except for packaging printing; Publishing services business; Postal services; Information Technology; Science and technology; Domain name registration and maintenance services; Internet; Network information security products and services in Vietnam. It is important for the company operating in the areas of concern to consult with telecom, internet business, media lawyers to follow up with specific changes in law in Vietnam.

These are industries with fast-growing trends and have a strong impact on other industries as well as on the overall economic development. Therefore, the facilitation and restriction of procedures will contribute to attracting foreign investment and creating development motivation for businesses, quickly catching up with the rapid changes of services, improving the quality of services and improving the quality of services information and communication products.

Accordingly, on procedures for granting certificates of eligibility to provide public electronic game services, for the application components “Plan for the location of the computer room of the public video game service point suitable according to the prescribed area” and “Pay the fee for the issuance of the Certificate of eligibility to operate the point of supply providing public video game services” were abolished. Especially, it is subject to change immediately after the time of licensing. Therefore, the information of the location of the machine room option at the time of consideration for licensing is of little significance. Besides, the Decision also mentions supplementing the form of implementing administrative procedures on electronic means (changing the form of paper copies into electronic ones) to be flexible and ensure consistency with the Enterprise Law 2020 in the implementation for businesses.

The decision also abolishes administrative procedures for granting licenses to provide G1, G2, G3, G4 video game services online. According to the plan, many procedures with G1 online game service will be abolished such as: licensing procedures; license re-issuance; license renewal or procedures for amending and supplementing the license to provide G1 video game services on the internet… This is a meaningful abolition decision for the practice of licensing video games. Because, it is challenging for state agencies to request enterprises to apply for permits and report every time they change their business plans, affecting the autonomy of enterprises as well as creating huge inadequacies in terms of business administrative procedures.

In addition, business conditions: “The publisher’s office has an appropriate area, meets the provisions of the law on standards and norms for using the office” has been simplified to ” having an office that meets the provisions of law on standards and norms for using the office”. This change is reasonable, because the criterion of suitable area has no basis for explanation. Moreover, the area of ​​the publisher’s headquarters is not related to the management of the State. With the new regulations, publishers can be autonomous in choosing the right area, ensuring space for business activities. At the same time, the Decision also combines two administrative procedures including re-issuance and renewal of licenses for printing and publishing publications into one administrative procedure, limiting cumbersome procedures, saving time and costs for businesses.

In addition, in the field of publication distribution service business, the Decision simplifies the process of granting certificates of registration for publishing and publishing electronic publications in the direction of only performing the verification process determining the project of publishing and distributing electronic publications. Therefore, if the project is eligible and accepted, the enterprise will be granted a certificate of operation registration immediately.

According to the simplified version of the Decision, the Postal Business Registration Certificate and the Postal Investment Certificate in Vietnam will be merged into the Business Registration Certificate.

Therefore, the introduction of Decision No. 1994/QD-TTg has reduced and simplified procedures; help the process of preparing documents quickly; save time for organizations and individuals when carrying out administrative procedures and minimize the cost of administrative compliance.

Thứ Hai, 18 tháng 9, 2023

When Foreign Currency Usage not Forbidden in Vietnam?



Foreign currency is a form of foreign exchange, the currency of another country or the common currency currently used in international and regional payments are collectively referred to as foreign currency. Cash foreign currency includes banknotes and coins. Banking and finance lawyers are always asked if an organization could use foreign currency on contract or for conducting certain business transactions, in Vietnam or abroad.


In order to ensure convenience in conducting transactions in Vietnam, ensure the rights of the State Bank and limit smuggling crimes, Foreign Exchange Ordinance provided: “within the territory of Vietnam, usage of foreign currency is not allowed in most cases for example foreign currency are not allowed in agreements, in making payments. Further, foreign currency even is not allowed in listings, advertisements, quotation, pricing. These apply for both residents and non- residents except for cases permitted in accordance with regulation of the State bank of Vietnam.”

However, there are some special cases where the Government allows individuals and organizations to use foreign currency when conducting transactions in the Vietnamese territory. Vietnam State Bank issued instructions that stipulate that residents are allowed to contribute capital in foreign currency by transfer in order to perform foreign investment projects in Vietnam. Residents being entities with legal person status are allowed to conduct internal transfer of capital in foreign currency between their accounts with accounts of their dependent units that have no legal person status and vice versa.

Non-residents are allowed to transfer in foreign currency for other non-residents; are allowed to denote prices in contracts in foreign currency and payment of export goods and services in foreign currency by transfer for residents. For foreign investors in Vietnam, foreign investors may deposit or escrow deposit in foreign currency by transfer when participating in auctions in the following cases:

(i) Purchase of shares in equitized state-owned enterprises approved by the Prime Minister;

(ii) Purchase of shares or contributed capital by the State in state-owned enterprises or divestment state-owned enterprises approved by the Prime Minister;

(iii) Purchase of shares or contributed capital of a State-owned enterprise to invest in another enterprise for divestment approved by the Prime Minister.

In case of winning the auction, the foreign investor shall transfer investment capital in accordance with the provisions of law on foreign exchange management to pay for the value of buying shares or contributed capital. In case of unsuccessful auction, foreign investors are allowed to transfer overseas the deposit or deposit in foreign currency after deducting related expenses, if any.

Except for the cases prescribed by the State Bank, acts of using foreign currency while performing transactions in the territory of Vietnam will be sanctioned depending on the seriousness of the violation. Therefore, individuals and organizations should pay attention to avoid unfortunate risks that may occur.

Thứ Ba, 10 tháng 1, 2023

What Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement is about? | ANT Lawyers

 On Jul 31st, 2015 the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiation ended without a resolution although a great progress has been made. The sad thing is that “they finished the part of the agreement that would raise environmental standards in Vietnam, Malaysia and the other countries in the bloc” according to The Wall Street Journal. It is expected the deal will continue to be worked on in the upcoming future meeting.


US, Japan, Vietnam and 9 other countries hoped to complete the signing of TPP in 2015. If successful, TPP is expected to be a major event occurred to Vietnam in 20 years (from the time Vietnam and the United States decided to normalize relations in 1995).


1. TPP is a free trade agreement between 12 countries with the aim of promoting economic integration in Asia – Pacific area. Twelve members of TPP include Australia, Brunei, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Canada, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam, the USA and Japan. South Korea, Colombia, Costa Rica, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand and many other countries are planning to participate in TPP. Originally, TPP started from an agreement among Singapore, Chile, New Zealand and Brunei in 2009, before the United States decided to join and lead.

2. The main objectives of TPP are the elimination of taxes and barriers for goods and trading services between member countries.

3. In addition, TPP will also unify laws, common rules between countries, such as intellectual property, food quality or work safety.

4. The current members of TPP accounted for 40% of the world GDP and 26% of global merchandise trade.

5. The United States expects the TPP will be the key point of their new destination in Asia. China has sometimes expressed their intention to join the TPP, but many of TPP’s current provision seem to be designed not to let China have the opportunity to participate in this agreement.

6. TPP is expected to set out the international rules that transcend the scope of the WTO, such as investment policies, protect intellectual property rights, control of state companies, and the quality of product and labor.

7. TPP is expected to create international laws capable of adjusting the policies and directions of the law in each member countries. In other words, the laws of the member countries will have to follow the orientation of the TPP. Many laws in TPP also influence the changes of the legal regime of the country. For example is the legislation to encourage the members of the TPP to open a government agency, with mechanism and the way to work like in the US to perform strengths-weaknesses analysis before issuing new domestic laws.

8. TPP includes 29 chapters, in which there are only 5 chapters are directly related to the issue of exchange of goods and services, the remaining chapters addressed many issues related to different benchmarks, standards about environment, labor quality, financial rules, food and medicine. TPP will remove many benefits of state companies which is currently playing a big role in i.e. Vietnam economy, to create competitive opportunities for private companies.

9. With TPP, foreign and international companies, corporations will be able to bring the government of the member country to TPP’s special court when these countries pose the rules that go against the norms of the TPP. This special court has full authority to make the government to compensate for damage not only occurred, but also the loss of opportunities in the future of international corporations, companies.

10. The TPP members have to sign non-disclosure agreement in the detailed negotiation process about the rules of TPP. These countries may only disclose information to government agencies, organizations, and individuals that are directly related to trade policy advisory.

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers have law firm in Hanoilaw firm in Ho Chi Minh City and law firm in Da Nang.

Thứ Hai, 9 tháng 1, 2023

Foreign Investors May Be Allowed to Hold 60% Shares | ANT Lawyers

 A new decision has been proposed to the Prime Minister with a number of changes that encourage foreign investors to make investment in Vietnam and in the meantime improve the financial market to catch up with international standard.


ANT Lawyers’ foreign investment practice always follow the change in legal environment to assist our client with the best service. First, foreign investors could own up to 60% of total voting right shares of a listed company. The previous provisions only allow this ratio for strategic partners. Secondly, the foreign investors may hold maximum 49% total voting right shares. The previous provision is 49% of charter capital. Thirdly, for non-voting right shares, the foreign investors are not restricted to hold. Fourthly, for fund certificate, the foreign investors may hold 100% for both close and open funds while the previous provision only allows 49% and restricts the foreign –owned in open funds. Fifthly, foreign organizations business in securities may hold securities companies in Vietnam up to 100% Charter capital while in recent provision, maximum of 49% and 100% for the specific cases.


When the new Decision will have been officially issued, the securities market of Vietnam will be more open and attractive to foreign investors. As expected, impact will be increasing liquidation, opening the conditions to establish investment funds, changing the enterprise’s structure, developing the fund management companies, and as such developing the financial market with more options to invest and control the investment in Vietnam.

We help clients overcome cultural barriers and achieve their strategic and financial outcomes, while ensuring the best interest rate protection, risk mitigation and regulatory compliance. ANT lawyers have law firm in Hanoilaw firm in Ho Chi Minh City and law firm in Da Nang.

Thứ Hai, 2 tháng 5, 2022

Cooperation between Vietnam and Japan After the Covid Epidemic | ANT Lawyers

On May 15, 2020, the Minister of Planning and Investment met Ambassador Mr. Yamada Takio (Japan) on the occasion of starting his working term in Vietnam. The parties spent time welcoming and sharing a number of problems that need to be resolved to promote investment activities between the two countries in the context of the Covid-19 epidemic, including promoting public investment, promoting investment in the private sector, attracting investors to set up company, factory and implement investment into export processing zones in Vietnam.



The Ambassador said there are currently more than a thousand Japanese experts who wish to have work permit, investment visa, temporary residece card to go to Vietnam to restore business production. In addition, Japanese small and medium enterprises are very interested in the Vietnam market. Japan Government has provided 23.5 billion yen (USD 220 million) to encourage domestic enterprises to transfer production activities to Southeast Asian countries, including Vietnam, which is an opportunity for Vietnam to attract FDI to register investment project in setting up factory in Vietnam.

Following the the investment shift after the US-China Trade war (2019) and the Covid-19 epidemic, many Japanese investors intend to withdraw from China to invest in Vietnam to set up factory, and company and form a new supply chain. Accordingly, Vietnam will have a plan to create a working group to attract Japanese enterprises to invest in the fields and provinces that Vietnam wishes to contribute more to the socio-economic development of Vietnam. In 2019, Japan is the fourth-largest FDI country in Vietnam, the second largest investment partner in Vietnam implementing the project, with a total investment of USD 59.3 billion.

With its advantages and experience, Japanese investors are investing in Vietnam in the fields of professional science, technology, information technology, wholesale, retail, engineering and real estate. These industries are the advantages of Japanese investors when investing in Vietnam, which it not only brings benefits to investors but also helps Vietnam to learn management experience and operation from Japan, helping Vietnam to apply to develop the domestic economy.

The Vietnamese representative emphasized the importance to attract Japanese enterprises to invest smoothly and successfully in Vietnam, including large and small and medium-sized enterprises to contribute more to the socio-economic development of Vietnam. At the same time, the Ministry of Planning and Investment continued to work closely with the Embassy as well as with the Ambassador’s individual to bring closer cooperation between the two countries.

Thứ Tư, 20 tháng 4, 2022

What Rights Shareholder Holds in Joint Stock Company? | ANT Lawyers

Shareholders are individual or organization that owns at least one share of the joint-stock company and also are owner of the joint-stock company. Along with these roles, their interests are tied to business operations although they may not directly manage the day-to-day company affairs. In order to implement governance, the powers and responsibilities of each interest group such as shareholders, the board of directors, managerial personnel, etc. should be assigned based on the statutory principles and procedures.

According to the regulations on shareholders in the Law on Enterprise 2020, the rights of shareholders can be categorized into the following groups: economic rights, governance rights, information rights, and litigation rights.

Economic rights

Economic right is the right to gain all pecuniary interest with respect to the shares. The purpose of starting a business or investing in securities comes mainly from earning income or gaining profits. Economic rights accordingly include:

-Right to entitlement to dividends

-Right to transfer ownership

-Priority right to acquire the newly issued shares

-Right to entitlement to a portion of the assets after dissolution or bankrupt

-Appraisal Right

Among these above rights, right to entitlement to dividends and right to transfer ownership are the fundamental economic rights of a shareholder.



Dividend of common shares is determined according to the realized net profit and the dividend payment from the company’s retained earnings. Despite right to entitlement to dividends, shareholders are still subject to a number of limitations in law and in fact. Dividend entitlement is determined by the General Meeting of Shareholders based on the recommendation of the Board of Directors, after the company has fulfilled tax obligations and other financial obligations, contributed to reserve fund, paid for previous losses and met the solvency for all due debts and other property obligations. Dividend is not required to be distributed annually. Depending on the business situation, the General Meeting of Shareholders may decide to retain profits for reinvestment.

Besides dividend entitlement from the company’s operating results, shareholders can also gain profits by share transfer. This kind of investment is popular with respect of shares or securities of public companies, investors do not aim for corporate governance rights as well as dividend, they intend to earn benefits by the difference of the market values of stocks, especially when the stock value increases.

Governance rights

Modern corporate governance has two principles, one is to separate ownership and governance and to separate governance and management. It means that the major shareholders should not hold senior managerial positions in the company and Chairperson of the Board of Directors should not be assigned to other senior managerial positions such as General Director and/or Director.

Shareholders may be an individual or organization which they have their own different interests, goals and abilities. The separation between ownership and management makes the situation of whom the owner is and how the share get transferred not to affect the business operation. In the meantime, the separation helps gather professional managers to implement target intended by the company. According to the laws, members of the Board of Directors of a public company concurrently holding several executive titles must be reduced to the minimum to ensure the independence of the Board of Directors, specially the Chairperson of the Board of Directors shall not be the Director/General Director in a public company as of August 1st, 2020. There are no similar rules applicable to joint stock companies which are not public company.

Attendance, speaking and voting at General Meeting of Shareholders are fundamental in governance right of common shareholders, applicable to all shareholders holding at least one share. ty. In principle, being a shareholder who holds shares of the company regardless of the number has equal rights to attend and vote at the General Meeting of Shareholders. By the General Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders holding a certain number of shares can impact decisions on some matters such as election, dismissal, and removal of members of the Board of Directors and Controllers, amendment and supplementation of internal documents, major transactions, and others as stipulated in law on enterprise or charter. In addition to the above rights, the majority shareholders also have a number of other rights related to governance as follows:

The shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 5% of the total number of common shares (charter may require a smaller percentage) is entitled to:

-Call a General Meeting of Shareholders

-Request Board of Controllers to inspect each specific matter relating to management, governance of company affairs if necessary

-Recommend matters to be included in agenda of General Meeting of Shareholders

-The shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 10% of the total number of common shares (charter may require a smaller percentage) is entitled to nominate candidates for the Board of Directors, Board of Controllers

Information rights

Shareholders have the right to access documents and information of the company. In addition to the basic documents such as the charter, list of shareholders, meeting minutes and resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders have the right to access to reports related to the business affairs.

However, some information is only reviewed by shareholders who own required percentage of share:

-Access and extract information on full name and contact address as specified in list of shareholders having voting right and list of shareholders having right to attend General Meeting of Shareholder; request to adjust his/her inaccurate information

-Access, extract and scan charter of company, meeting minutes of General Meeting of Shareholder and its resolution

-Access, extract and copy partial or whole list of involved persons and their contracts, transaction of which the company is other party, interests of Board of Directors, Controllers, Directors or General Directors and other managerial positions of company

-Access and extract minutes and resolutions of Board of Directors, annual or mid-year financial reports, reports of Board of Controllers, contracts and transaction approved by Board of Directors and other documents, excepting for documents related to company’s know-how and trade secrets (applicable to shareholder and group of shareholders who own at least 5% of total number of common shares, the charter may require a smaller percentage)

-Access profit and loss statements, financial reports, governance and management assessment reports; inspection reports of Board of Controllers (applicable to shareholder who own shares at least 1 consecutive year, the charter may require a smaller percentage)

Different to common joint stock company, a public company must announce fully, accurately and promptly the periodic and extraordinary information on business, finance and governance. Other information must be announced if it influences share price and investment decisions of shareholders and investors.

Litigation rights

The Law on Enterprises has provided a mechanism to request the Court or Arbitration to rescind the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders or sue the managerial personnels when they fail to fully and properly implement their tasks, including:

The shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 5% of the total number of common shares (charter may require a smaller percentage) is entitled to:

-Request to rescind resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders when the orders and procedures of calling the meeting and making resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders seriously violate the regulations of the Law on Enterprises and company’s charter

-However, the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders adopted by 100% of the total number of voting shares is legal and effective even when the orders and procedures of calling the meeting and adopting such resolution violates regulations of the Law on Enterprises and company’s charter.

-Request to rescind resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders when its provisions violates the laws or company’s charter

-The shareholder, group of shareholders holding at least 1% of the total number of common shares is entitled to:

-Sue members of Board of Directors, Directors, General Directors separately or jointly under certain circumstances

The Chairperson of Board of Directors or the Director or General Director usually acts as the legal representative of the company, representing the company to perform rights and obligations arising from the company’s transactions, representing the company to take proceedings before the court or arbitrator. However, when their interests conflict with those of the shareholders, shareholders have the right to initiate a lawsuit claiming benefits or compensation. The Law on Enterprise also permits shareholders to sue on behalf of the company when the above managerial personnels commit violations, causing damage directly to the company and indirectly to shareholders.

Not all shareholders have the right to sue for the above managerial personnels, only those who own at least 1% of the total number of common shares. This restriction makes sense with respect of public companies, in order to eliminate unfair competition actions conducted by minority shareholders who is controlled by the rival companies because amount of 1% in public company is not a small number.



Similar to a lawsuit against a manager, shareholder or group of shareholders is also required to own at least 5% of the total number of common shares to request rescission of the resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders if there is violation on substantive law and procedural law. Accordingly, all resolutions of the General Meeting of Shareholders violating the substantive laws or the company’s charter are rescinded at the request of shareholders, but only serious procedural violations may be rescinded. There is no specific instructions for serious procedural violations at this time, the assessment will depend on personal perspective of the court and arbitrator.